Rover 400 1991 vs Audi 80 1992

 
Rover 400
1991 - 1993
Audi 80
1992 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 92 HP71 HP
Torque: 122 NM127 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds15.4 seconds
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 400 engine produces 21 HP more power than Audi 80, but torque is 5 NM less than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.9
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 400 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.48 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`640
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 80 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv