Rover 400 1999 vs Seat Toledo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 41 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 86 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.0 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 400 and Seat Toledo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
720 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |