Rover 400 1995 vs Seat Toledo 1995
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 37 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Rover 400 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 400 and Seat Toledo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
720 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |