Rover 400 1997 vs Mazda 626 1997

 
Rover 400
1997 - 1999
Mazda 626
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP90 HP
Torque: 127 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds12.6 seconds
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 400 engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda 626, but torque is 18 NM less than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.87.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 400 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1030 km on highway
670 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.58 m
Width: 1.70 m1.71 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
Rover 400 is smaller.
Rover 400 is 26 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres502 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
7320 litresno data
Mazda 626 has more luggage space.
Rover 400 has 132 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 626.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`680
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Mazda 626 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv