Rover 400 1996 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 400 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Galant can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 175 HP | 90 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 240 NM | 178 - 363 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14 seconds | 8.2 - 12.8 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Galant are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Rover 400. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.2 | 7.0 - 11.8 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Galant. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
810 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`684 kg | ~ 1`851 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`233 kg | ~ 1`349 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 451 kg | ~ 502 kg | |
| Rover 400 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Galant. Therefore, Mitsubishi Galant is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |