Rover 400 1996 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 400 is available only with front wheel drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 175 HP | 75 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 240 NM | 126 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14 seconds | 7.9 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.2 | 5.0 - 9.0 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
810 litres | 1330 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Rover 400 has 58 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 520 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`684 kg | ~ 1`831 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`233 kg | ~ 1`301 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 451 kg | ~ 530 kg | |
| Rover 400 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Skoda Octavia. Therefore, Skoda Octavia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |