Rover 400 1996 vs Honda Civic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 175 HP | 90 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 240 NM | 124 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14 seconds | 8.1 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.2 | 6.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 3 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Rover 400 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`594 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |