Rover 400 1990 vs Seat Toledo 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 - 200 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 237 NM | 124 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.5 seconds | 9.4 - 16.5 seconds | |
| In general, Rover 400 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Seat Toledo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.9 | 5.7 - 8.9 | |
|
On average, the Rover 400 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Seat Toledo. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 5 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Rover 400 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`560 kg | ~ 1`552 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`131 kg | ~ 1`059 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 429 kg | ~ 493 kg | |
| Rover 400 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Seat Toledo. Therefore, Seat Toledo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |