Rover 400 1990 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 400 is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Scorpio can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 - 200 HP | 92 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 237 NM | 171 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.5 seconds | 8.8 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.9 | 7.1 - 11.2 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 37 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`560 | ~ 1`748 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |