Rover 400 1990 vs Audi 80 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 400 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi 80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 - 200 HP | 70 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 237 NM | 118 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.5 seconds | 8 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.9 | 5.2 - 10.3 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi 80. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
| Rover 400 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`560 | ~ 1`745 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Audi 80 has
| |