Rover 400 1990 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 - 200 HP | 68 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 237 NM | 108 - 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.5 seconds | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.9 | 6.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Rover 400 is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`560 | ~ 1`019 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |