Rover 400 1990 vs Ford Sierra 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 400 is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Sierra can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 - 200 HP | 71 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 237 NM | 119 - 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.5 seconds | 6.9 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.9 | 6.4 - 10.6 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`560 | ~ 1`193 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |