Rover 400 1995 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover 400 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Yaris has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 136 HP | 69 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 210 NM | 93 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 14 seconds | 9.3 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 4.5 - 7.2 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 3.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.53 m | |
| Rover 400 is 56 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
7320 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Rover 400 has 95 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Rover 400 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`642 | ~ 886 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |