Rover 400 1995 vs Citroen Xantia 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover 400 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Citroen Xantia has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 136 HP | 71 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 210 NM | 121 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 14 seconds | 8.2 - 23.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 6.2 - 11.6 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xantia. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller, but slightly higher. Rover 400 is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen Xantia, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
7320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`642 | ~ 1`253 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |