Rover 25 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 84 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 20.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 25 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.1 | |
|
The Rover 25 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Rover 25 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 44 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 71 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |