Rover 25 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 70 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger. Rover 25 is 27 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 975 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 59 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |