Rover 25 1999 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 90 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 4.2 | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 25 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 58 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 165 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 335 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |