Rover 25 1999 vs Mazda 2 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 45 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.1 | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but lower. Rover 25 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1044 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 37 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 42 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |