Rover 25 2002 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 11 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 34 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |