Rover 25 2002 vs Seat Ibiza 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 112 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 11 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, but torque is 17 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.9 | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.99 m | 3.95 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 25 is 4 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 25 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 265 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1030 litres | |
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 39 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 56 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |