Rover 25 2000 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Rover 25 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Rover 25 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1016 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |