Rover 25 2000 vs Seat Ibiza 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Rover 25 engine produces 5 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Despite less power, Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.9 | |
|
The Rover 25 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Rover 25 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 25 is 4 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 25 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |