Rover 25 2004 vs Mazda 2 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 7.1 | |
|
The Rover 25 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Rover 25 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but lower. Rover 25 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1044 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |