Rover 25 1999 vs Seat Ibiza 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving. Rover 25 engine produces 10 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, but torque is 5 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 25 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 25 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Land Rover Freelander, Rover 45 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6, Seat Alhambra, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger. Rover 25 is 11 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 785 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 301 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |