Rover 25 1999 vs Hyundai Getz 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 18 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.0 | |
|
The Rover 25 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that by driving the Rover 25 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Rover 25 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Land Rover Freelander, Rover 45 | Used also on Hyundai Matrix | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 25 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but lower. Rover 25 is 18 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 3 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 977 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |