Rover 25 1999 vs Seat Ibiza 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving. Rover 25 engine produces 35 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.9 | |
Rover 25 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.99 m | 3.95 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 25 is 4 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 25 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 265 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`675 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |