Rover 25 1999 vs Hyundai Getz 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 108 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is a more dynamic driving. Rover 25 engine produces 3 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, but torque is 8 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Despite the higher power, Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 25 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Rover 25 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 25 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 200, Rover 400, Rover 45 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but lower. Rover 25 is 18 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 3 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 977 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |