Rover 25 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 3 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 3 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 44 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 71 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |