Rover 25 2004 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 36 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.8 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 44 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 71 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |