Rover 25 2004 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Rover 25 and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, but Rover 25 torque is 10 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.7 | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.99 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1016 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`625 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |