Rover 25 2005 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 108 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 25 engine produces 44 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 25 is smaller. Rover 25 is 38 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 25 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`500 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |