Rover 25 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 108 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 33 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.8 | |
|
The Rover 25 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Rover 25 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 200, Rover 400, Rover 45 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2001 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2001 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1015 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |