Rover 25 2005 vs Mazda 2 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 108 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 8 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 8 NM less than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.1 | |
| Rover 25 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Rover 25 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but lower. Rover 25 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1044 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |