Rover 25 2004 vs Volvo V40 2016

 
Rover 25
2004 - 2005
Volvo V40
2016 -
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 108 HP152 HP
Torque: 138 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds8.3 seconds
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 25 engine produces 44 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7no data
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres62 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.99 m4.37 m
Width: 1.69 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Rover 25 is smaller.
Rover 25 is 38 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 25 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres324 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1086 litres1500 litres
Rover 25 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 414 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`500no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 100012 200
Pros and Cons: Rover 25 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv