Rover 25 2004 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 35 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 3.8 | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Rover 25 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 200, Rover 400, Rover 45 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Rover 25 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 58 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 165 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 335 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Rover 25 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |