Rover 25 1999 vs Seat Ibiza 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 64 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 240 NM | 112 - 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 13.5 seconds | 7.3 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.2 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
|
Rover 25 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. On average, Rover 25 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 25 is 4 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 25 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 39 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`512 | ~ 1`654 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |