Rover 25 1999 vs Hyundai Getz 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 62 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 240 NM | 96 - 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 13.5 seconds | 9.6 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.2 | 5.8 - 7.6 | |
|
Rover 25 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Getz. On average, Rover 25 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but lower. Rover 25 is 18 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 3 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 977 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`512 | ~ 1`509 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |