Rover 25 1999 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 240 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 13.5 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.2 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Rover 25 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Rover 25 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 25 is smaller. Rover 25 is 38 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 25 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Rover 25 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 414 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`513 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |