Rover 25 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Rover 25
1999 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
1994 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 2.01.0 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 75 - 145 HP45 - 100 HP
Torque: 95 - 240 NM76 - 135 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 13.5 seconds10.5 - 21.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.24.7 - 8.6
On average, the Rover 25 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Polo. On average, a Rover 25 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.99 m3.72 m
Width: 1.69 m1.66 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Rover 25 is larger.
Rover 25 is 27 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1086 litres975 litres
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity.
Rover 25 has 59 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 111 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`513~ 1`401
Safety:
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Rover 25 has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv