Rover 25 1999 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 55 - 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 240 NM | 93 - 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 13.5 seconds | 14.2 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.2 | 3.8 - 4.2 | |
|
Rover 25 petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. On average, Rover 25 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 58 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 165 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 335 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Rover 25 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`513 | ~ 1`188 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |