Rover 25 1999 vs BMW X5 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 25 is available with front wheel drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 2.9 - 4.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 184 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 240 NM | 300 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 13.5 seconds | 6.5 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.2 | 9.6 - 15.0 | |
|
Rover 25 petrol engines consumes on average 6.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Rover 25 equipped with diesel engines consume 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Rover 25 is smaller. Rover 25 is 68 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 25 is 30 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Rover 25 has 161 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 464 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 2 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`513 | ~ 2`646 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |