Rover 200 1993 vs Fiat Croma 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 20 HP more power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Fiat Croma. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.9 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 30 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |