Rover 200 1993 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 237 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 84 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.2 | |
| Rover 200 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 400 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 200 is 10 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`615 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |