Rover 200 1993 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 237 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 94 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 87 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.2 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 323 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 400 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 23 cm longer than the Mazda 323, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | 309 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`615 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |