Rover 200 1995 vs Seat Toledo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 55 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 25 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 200 is 35 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |