Rover 200 1995 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 55 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 25 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Toledo, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ibiza might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 12 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 580 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 34 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 506 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |