Rover 200 1995 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 33 HP more power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Peugeot 306. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 200 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 306 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 25 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen Xantia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
| Rover 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Rover 200 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |