Rover 200 1993 vs Volkswagen Golf 1986

 
Rover 200
1993 - 2000
Volkswagen Golf
1986 - 1989
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP72 HP
Torque: 138 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds13.5 seconds
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 200 engine produces 50 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.57.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
630 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m3.98 m
Width: 1.68 m1.66 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Rover 200 is larger, but slightly lower.
Rover 200 is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 300 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`580no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data1200
Pros and Cons: Rover 200 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv