Rover 200 1993 vs Ford Escort 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 32 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 200 is 8 cm longer than the Ford Escort, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Escort. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Ford Escort has
| |