Rover 200 1992 vs Volvo V40 2016

 
Rover 200
1992 - 2000
Volvo V40
2016 -
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP152 HP
Torque: 127 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds8.3 seconds
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 200 engine produces 49 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.1no data
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
710 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.37 m
Width: 1.68 m1.80 m
Height: 1.39 m1.44 m
Rover 200 is smaller.
Rover 200 is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres324 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1500 litres
Volvo V40 has more luggage space.
Rover 200 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`550no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data11 600
Pros and Cons: Rover 200 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • hydraulic power steering
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv