Rover 200 1992 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 200 engine produces 49 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 200 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Rover 200 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`550 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |